A cheap evaluation is not automatically a bad one. It is usually cheap for a reason, and the reason is normally in the rulebook rather than in the price.
Evaluation fees vary mostly because of account size, how many phases there are, how tight the drawdown is and how generous the split is. A cheap challenge is often a smaller account, a tighter daily loss limit, a trailing drawdown instead of a static one, or a lower profit share. Compare the rules and the split, not the fee.

Expectancy per trade = (win% × R − loss%) × risk%. Trades needed = target ÷ expectancy. This is average-case arithmetic with no drawdown path and no guarantee: variance decides the real number, and a negative expectancy never reaches the target at all.
Three questions, the numbers rolled each time, no signup. The working is shown either way, so a wrong answer still teaches you the sum.
Pick one.
Compare two evaluations on what you would keep, not on what you pay. Take the account size, the profit target and the split, and work out what a passing run actually returns after the fee. A cheaper challenge with a materially lower split can be the more expensive route the first time you are paid, and every time after.
The calculator on this page does the target side of that sum. Our rules comparison has the drawdown type and the consistency rule for each firm, taken from their own published terms.
Some prices are low because the rules make passing unlikely, or because the payout terms are where the difficulty was moved to. Things worth checking before the fee:

Chart Bound's Prop Arena runs a simulated evaluation against each firm's own published rules, over real tape, free. It is the cheapest way to find out whether the rules suit you before a fee is involved.
Play free, no signup →The cheapest way to find out whether a rulebook suits you is to trade under it without paying anything. That is what the free Prop Arena is for. If a trailing drawdown ends your simulated run three times, that is worth knowing before a fee, and it costs nothing to learn.
We are not affiliated with any firm and we do not rank them. This page is about how to read a price, not which one to buy.
Price alone tells you very little. A low fee usually reflects a smaller account, an extra phase, a tighter drawdown or a lower split. The questions worth asking are about the rules and the payout terms.
Trading the same rules in a simulation first, which costs nothing. It will not fund you, but it tells you whether the drawdown type and the consistency rule fit how you trade.
Often, because a lower profit split is one of the levers firms use to hold the fee down. Compare the split and the account size together.
Neither is better in general. One-step is usually dearer and faster, two-step cheaper and longer. It depends on which rule you are most likely to break.
Free to use, on any site, with no signup: paste this one line where you want the tool to appear. It loads our hosted version, so it stays up to date, and the link under it credits back to this page.
420×620 by default and it scales down to fit a narrower column. Please keep the attribution link.

Chart Bound's Prop Arena runs a simulated evaluation against each firm's own published rules, over real tape, free. It is the cheapest way to find out whether the rules suit you before a fee is involved.
Play free, no signup →